BID® Daily Newsletter
Mar 16, 2018

BID® Daily Newsletter

Mar 16, 2018

Recovering With A New Bank Leverage Ratio

Summary: A new leverage ratio for community banks was created measuring a bank's tangible equity against the total of its average consolidated assets. This is good news. We give you the highlights.

What a bizarre story. It seems a neurosurgeon at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi did brain surgery on the wrong patient. ID tags were reportedly mixed up between this patient and another one. The patient is fine, but the hospital suspended the surgeon and others on the team. That sounds like the right step to take until you hear that a bunch of other doctors are on strike now until a whole bunch of operational procedures are fixed and the doctor is reinstated. It seems this boneheaded hospital has not yet relented, despite the fact there were 2 patients admitted at about the same time, both of which had head injuries, both of which needed surgery and both of which had the same last name. It also seems the hospital is way understaffed, with doctors routinely doing up to 19 operations a day.
While not as life threatening as messing up the paperwork for brain surgery, bankers also know a thing or two about getting paperwork right. New regulations usually mean double-checking everything too.
On December 5, 2017 the Senate Banking Committee released a regulatory relief bill that can now be considered by the full Senate. For community banks, the bill amends the Volcker Rule by exempting community banks with assets <$10B entirely and establishes a "Community Bank Leverage Ratio" (CBLR).
The Volcker Rule stuff we have covered before so we skip it here and focus on the CBLR.
Under these new rules, federal banking agencies would be required to establish a CBLR of no less than 8% and no more than 10% for qualifying community banks. Any bank or insured depository financial organization with assets totaling less than $10B, whose risk profile does not cause its primary federal regulator to deem it ineligible, would be considered to be well capitalized and compliant with leverage and capital requirements. The legislation would also give regulators the freedom to determine if other factors need to be included in the definition over the course of the rulemaking process.
According to estimates from Standard & Poor's Global Market Intelligence, of the universe of more than 5k community banks with less than $10B of assets, only about 1% of them are currently considered to be under-capitalized, based on the existing risk-based guidelines.
That means the CBLR would only change the standing of a handful of community banks. Those currently considered poorly capitalized would still be unable to qualify for the new leverage ratio. Community banks can choose to remain under the current risk-based capital guidelines or switch to the CBLR.
So, will community banks choose the new leverage ratio? For most banks, there is still a benefit to switch. For starters, it is simpler than current risk-based capital ratios, especially for loans such as CRE. High volatility CRE loans carry a 150% risk weight and the effort needed to determine this can be time-consuming for community banks. Next, there are also the added benefits of a simplified call report for banks under $5B and an 18 month exam cycle for banks under $3B vs. the previous limit of $1B.
But, the biggest benefit of the CBLR could be its ability to shield qualifying banks from Basel III and the increased compliance costs these regulatory measures will create once banks must begin adhering to them at the end of March 2019.
The CBLR allows community banks to choose to adopt it or stay with the current approach. So, our advice is to check and double check all of this regulatory paperwork to avoid damaging your brain and your bank when it becomes effective.
Subscribe to the BID Daily Newsletter to have it delivered by email daily.

Related Articles:

OCC & FDIC Propose Policy Changes To Enhance M&A Transparency
The OCC and FDIC have each proposed rules to enhance transparency around their processes of reviewing M&A transactions under the Bank Merger Act. We summarize the details of each agency’s proposal and provide resources to review and comment on the suggested changes.
The Risky Side of Fintech Partnerships
Partnering with fintechs is a good way for CFIs to quickly enhance their online services and offerings. But such partnerships can also create unintended risks for CFIs, a reality that has spurred regulators to step up oversight in this area.