BID® Daily Newsletter
Jun 24, 2025

BID® Daily Newsletter

Jun 24, 2025

Are Universal Bankers Right for Your Branch?

Summary: Universal bankers — staffers trained to handle every task in the branch — are the way forward for many CFIs. We explain roadblocks to this model and offer suggestions for overcoming them.

Blood type O negative is known as the “universal donor” blood type, meaning that individuals with this blood type can donate red blood cells to anyone. Accounting for only 7% of the population, O-negative blood is in high demand — especially for emergencies, when the recipient’s blood type is unknown.
A universal banker isn’t equipped to save lives, but the role is still part of a business model that some community financial institutions (CFIs) see as the way forward. Rather than train people to perform just one task, the logic goes, train them to be good at lots of things. Customers will get help faster, because they don’t have to be passed from one employee to another, and bank bottom lines may benefit by having fewer total employees.
Universal Banker Duties
The universality of a universal banker is in the wide array of tasks such a person performs. Like a teller, the universal banker handles deposits, withdrawals, and other financial transactions while also managing a cash drawer. Yet, the job description goes on from there, requiring a staffer who can provide banking experiences that are tailored to individual customer circumstances.
A typical day might include opening, updating, and maintaining customer accounts. Universal bankers may also be expected to cross-sell products and services that meet client needs, including consumer and small business deposit products, as well as SMB loans. In addition, they can handle a range of customer interactions, such as answering questions, resolving complaints, and responding to service requests.
Considerations for Your Institution
While the universal banker model can deliver significant benefits, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Institutions should thoughtfully assess branch traffic patterns, customer needs, and operational constraints before deciding whether to adopt this approach. For some branches, the model may enhance service efficiency and staff versatility. For others, maintaining a mix of traditional roles could better align with customer expectations. By thoroughly evaluating these factors, financial institutions can determine the most suitable path forward for their unique circumstances.
However, realizing the model’s full potential requires confronting practical barriers that often arise during implementation, particularly in areas like training, engagement, and support systems.
Barriers to Training Universal Bankers
Implementing a universal banker model offers significant potential for enhancing customer service, but it is not without challenges. For institutions considering this approach, it’s important to understand the associated barriers and evaluate whether it aligns with branch-specific needs and goals. These challenges fall into a few key areas, including employee engagement, training strategies, and technology considerations.
  • Employee adaptation to new roles. Shifting to the universal banker model requires employees to adopt broader responsibilities, which can lead to resistance or apprehension. Some staff may feel uncertain about their ability to succeed in a role that requires both transactional efficiency and financial advisory skills. Institutions exploring this model should prioritize clear communication about the purpose of the transition. Sharing potential benefits, such as career growth prospects or competitive compensation, can help mitigate resistance. Encouraging employee input may also foster a sense of collaboration and facilitate smoother adoption.
  • Developing comprehensive training. Training is a critical component of this model, as universal bankers must be equipped to handle a wide array of tasks, including account management, loan assistance, and cross-selling opportunities. However, inadequate training frameworks can leave employees unprepared. Banks considering this model could focus on phased training programs, leveraging industry certifications and tools that provide ongoing learning opportunities. For example, incorporating generative AI solutions can complement formal training by offering rapid answers to complex queries.
  • Technology preparedness. Adopting a universal banker model often hinges on having the right technology in place. Integrated systems that provide a unified view of customer data are essential for enabling bankers to switch seamlessly between roles. However, smaller institutions in particular may face constraints when modernizing legacy systems. For branches evaluating this model, incremental technology upgrades, such as teller cash recyclers or consolidated dashboards, can help streamline processes and support staff as they adapt.
  • Balancing training and branch operations. Balancing employee training with the operational demands of busy branches presents an ongoing challenge. For branches considering a universal banker strategy, it’s essential to allocate dedicated time for training activities, whether through simulation exercises or guided practice during downtime. Setting measurable goals, such as allocating hours each week for skill development, can help ensure training remains a priority without disrupting day-to-day operations.
  • Cultural and operational shifts. Transitioning to this model requires a cultural mindset shift where employees function as “utility players” rather than specialists. For some branches, this may mean reevaluating traditional incentive structures that focus on individual performance and instead implementing team-based rewards. Additionally, ongoing coaching and role rotation can help support employees as they grow into their expanded roles.
Tailoring the Universal Banker Model to Your Branch
To make the most of the universal banker model, it’s essential to align staffing with your branch’s traffic patterns and customer needs. High-traffic locations with frequent, simple cash transactions may benefit from a blended approach, retaining dedicated tellers alongside universal bankers. In contrast, lower-volume branches with more complex customer interactions might be ideal for a fully universal model.
Supporting this shift requires thoughtful infrastructure. Cash automation tools, such as teller cash recyclers, can reduce the manual burden on staff and improve control, freeing up bankers to focus on customer relationships. Clear wayfinding elements — including signage, floor markers, or greeters — can also help customers adjust to new service flows, especially during transition periods.
Equally important is ensuring that employees have time to develop their broader skill set. Establishing weekly or monthly goals for how much time bankers spend in various roles can help prevent them from defaulting to teller duties. Without intentional practice, a universal banker risks becoming a teller in all but name.
Successfully adopting the universal banker model requires more than just redefining job roles — it calls for cultural shifts, smart training investments, and alignment with each branch’s operational reality. When thoughtfully implemented, this approach can boost efficiency, enhance customer service, and maximize staffing flexibility. But like any strategic change, it works best when it’s tailored — not forced. By assessing branch dynamics and supporting employees through the transition, CFIs can determine where this model adds the most value and how to roll it out in a way that sticks.
Subscribe to the BID Daily Newsletter to have it delivered by email daily.

Related Articles:

It’s Time To Create the Branch of the Future
By modernizing physical spaces, creating community hubs, and blending digital tools with personalized service, CFIs can ensure their branches are vital, customer-centric destinations now and in the future.
Finding the Right Chatbot-Human Balance for Customer Service
Using chatbots for customer service can increase efficiency for CFI personnel, but sometimes customers really need to interact with a person. We provide best practices for balancing chatbots with the human touch.